Derek Muller, a law professor at Notre Dame University, said “it appears no,” noting that the liberals complained that the majority ruling forecloses another ways for Congress to enforce the provision. Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California-Los Angeles, wrote that it’s frustratingly unclear what the bounds may be on Congress. It’s unclear whether or not the ruling leaves open the possibility that Congress may refuse to certify the election of Trump or some other presidential candidate it sees as having violated Section 3. The justices sidestepped the politically fraught concern of revolt of their opinions Monday. The Supreme Court on Monday unanimously restored Donald Trump to 2024 presidential major ballots, rejecting state makes an attempt to ban the Republican former president over the Capitol riot.
- Legal sector group submits views as a part of public consultation over safety law, which authorities say recorded overwhelming assist.
- You
